Orchid growers are fairly unique in the horticulture world, as we often see recommendations for TDS or “Total Dissolved Solids” as a way to control our feeding regimens, while most professionals use nitrogen concentration (ppm N) and electrical conductivity, or EC. Why? Because the use of a TDS meter is inherently sloppy.
First, what does “TDS” or “total dissolved solids” mean? Simply, it is the sum of the minerals dissolved in a liquid. Looking at it more practically, if you allow the water to evaporate from a solution, the remainder is the dissolved solids content. It is often expressed a “parts-per-million” or just “ppm”, indicating a concentration equal to [so many] milligrams-per-kilogram.
TDS meter are really nothing more than inexpensive EC meters with a built-in conversion factor. Unfortunately, that is misleading because the TDS-EC relationship is not fixed at all, but is determined by which minerals are dissolved in the water, in what ratios and what concentrations. So, how about a “real life” example?
Many growers rely upon the original so-called “MSU Fertilizers” – “Orchid Special for Well Water” (MSU WW), “Orchid Special for RO Water” (MSU RO), as well as “K-Lite Orchid/Epiphyte Fertilizer” (K-Lite), a derivative of the MSU RO formula, all manufactured by Greencare Fertilizers, using the same raw materials. The table below contains some manufacturer-supplied data for solutions made with pure (distilled, EC=0) water:
MSU WW | MSU RO | K-Lite | ||
1. | N | 19 | 13 | 12 |
2. | P | 4 | 3 | 1 |
3. | K | 23 | 15 | 1 |
4. | Ca | 2 | 8 | 10 |
5. | Mg | 2 | 3 | |
6. | EC (mS/cm) | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.71 |
7. | EC, Normalized | 1 | 1.18 | 1.04 |
8. | grams/liter | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
9. | True TDS (ppm) | 530 | 740 | 770 |
10. | TDS, Normalized | 1 | 1.40 | 1.45 |
If we look at the electrical conductivities for the solutions @ 100 ppm N, a reasonable concentration for weekly feeding (row 6), then normalize them to that of the MSUWW value (row7), the EC of the MSU RO and K-Lite solutions are only about 18% and 4% greater, respectively. If we used a “standardized” TDS meter to measure them, the TDS values would follow suit. For example, If you had the three formulas mixed to the same ppm N level, your meter might read 300-, 354-, and 312 ppm TDS, respectively.
However, if we look at the mass of fertilizer needed per-liter to reach that 100 ppm N concentration (row8) – the true dissolved solids content (row 9, expressed as ppm) – and again normalizing for the MSU WW formula (row 10), we see that the TDS of the two other formulas are actually 40% and 45% greater, respectively.
Don’t throw that meter away! By using known fertilizer concentrations, you can create your own “calibration curve” for each formula, allowing you to use it to check the concentration of your fertilizer solutions.